Not quite

Well, White Nationalists have never been hostile to paedophilia, as long as it is not miscegenation.

I have to admit that I disagree with you here.

If you had said (male, hetero) hebephilia I would not entirely disagree. Of course hebephilia is pedophilia in the very broad sense currently defined by the State and by so-called polite society. An admitted pedophile into prepubescents like Lateralus, however, would be rejected out of hand by most any neo-Nazi organization, even if he didn't have a congenital physical deformity. The largest neo-Nazi org in the postwar West was the National Alliance under Dr. William Luther Pierce - and they openly advocated the extermination of admitted pedophiles as well as child pornographers (the latter were claimed to be overwhelmingly Jews, who WLP, et al. also blamed for the "sexualization" of children in the MSM). Have you listened much to American Dissident Voices? I have. Yes, I know about Kevin Strom, but who ever said that neo-Nazis were not sexually repressed and neurotic hypocrites?

I am aware of the late David Lane, I've heard his comments on Lynx and Lamb, and I've read KD Rebel. But guess what? It's all hebephilia, no evidence of pedophilia in the narrow sense of sexual attraction to prepubescents, let alone primary or exclusive. There are many neo-Nazis with the attitude that healthy young Aryan women should start breeding as early as possible. That goes with hebephilia, but pedophilia is considered a perversion along with homosexuality in the same eugenicist worldview.

As I've pointed out before, you often confuse men's hetero-hebephilia with pedophilia in the much narrower sense. I notice that you do this with regard to Islamic countries as well. Nearly all the "pedophilia" in Saudi Arabia, for example, is almost certainly hebephilia.

Considering that we've disagreed on that before, it's odd how Lateralus keeps lumping us together in this thread. Or maybe not so odd considering what a simplistic and cartoonish view of reality he has. Since I don't hysterically demonize the Nazis much the way they hysterically demonized the Jews, he thinks he can pin me as a Nazi sympathizer. Silly and quite Joe McCarthyesque at that. I point out the empirical fact that rednecks, even the bigoted rednecks, are by and large not the people in power and he thinks he can paint me as someone who loves bigoted rednecks! How much more simplistic can someone get? I also notice he ignored my very sound point that blacks are more likely to have "redneck" beliefs and attitudes than whites, yet rednecks are stereotypically white (as the very word implies - blacks don't get red necks). If he really wanted to get rid of "rednecks," if he were honest he'd be ranting against dark-skinned ghetto people before wasting time complaining about a few hillbillies.