GirlChat #506270
Re: that's NOT totalitarianism
Posted by Silence Dogood on 2010-July-08 12:41:34 EDT, Thursday
In reply to Re: that's NOT totalitarianism posted by Baldur on 2010-July-06 09:23:00 EDT, Tuesday
I've heard that argument before; for me, it feels like a cop out. A democratic government can either do legitimate, worthwhile things for society or it can't, and saying things done by one part of the government (i.e. the military) are legitimate and others aren't seems subjective.
At the end of the day, I think it's all subjective and the proper role of government differs over time and according to the nature of different societies and their needs. I think people of libertarian type points of view are way too dogmatic about things. There are some places government should not go, yes; ultimately, though, I think there has to be some medium: a government that holds to certain principles about it's role that people can still hold responsible for certain needs.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: that's NOT totalitarianism - Baldur on 2010-July-09 17:45:00 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- Re: that's NOT totalitarianism - Lateralus on 2010-July-09 18:54:55 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Oops, that was for Silence Dogood--NT - Lateralus on 2010-July-09 18:55:37 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: that's NOT totalitarianism - Lateralus on 2010-July-09 18:54:55 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Re: that's NOT totalitarianism - Sigma on 2010-July-09 05:00:03 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: that's NOT totalitarianism - qtns2di4 on 2010-July-08 04:50:45 EDT, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)