A challenge for any takers

I would like if someone would make a post explaining the two main schools of thought regarding both the topics of A.) why people are generally made less of a risk for viewing porn as opposed to the opposite school who thinks they are made more of a risk for viewing it, and B.) why the production of porn is not necessarily abusive to children featured in it and could even be seen as saving children from abuse in many cases, as opposed to the opposite school who thinks children are magically and automatically abused in all cases where child porn (or any form of child erotica) is produced.

The reason I make this request is because I would like to archive a good example on this, since my brain is not so organized at the moment to be able to put something really nice together. I know all the reasons, but can't seem to put it in a nicely organized fashion right now.

Thanks in advance to any takers of this challenge. Even if you were to post something that was written by someone else, that would be great.