GirlChat #504765


Re: Devilling a little…

Posted by qtns2di4 on 2010-June-20 12:41:00 EDT, Sunday
In reply to Re: Devilling a little… posted by Sigma on 2010-June-19 23:35:45 EDT, Saturday

  Views: 1    Likes: 0     

According to zionist/neocon sources (remember, the ones you say tell the truth), many-to-most of these child marriages are completed without the girls' knowledge or consent.

I was doubting Lat's (and the neocons', and the liberals' {because Unicef is surely not a neocon outfit}) implication that you can infer rights or lack thereof from age. I suppose you should raise the AOM to 110 (which has been suggested by LGsinmyheart on GC, regarding the AOC) so that there really are rights.

Never mind, of course, that I hold to a different standard mainstreamers, for whom consent is something that magically appears on a very very specific seemingly God-given date and is never ever present before that Magic Day; and GCers, who (even anti-contacters) I think should know better than that.

The more exclusive the male pedophile, the more likely he'll be into prepub children of both sexes.

Source. I will accept an anecdotal poll in a pedo gathering place.

Beware that it has to be significantly higher than the proportion of AAP attracted to both adult genders (which is itself rather high), or it can't be distinguishable from "bisexuality" in general.

Wow, what a hilarious assertion. That's like saying a real (male) heterosexual is attracted to every woman.

Well, in my experience that is how most non-hypocrite heterosexuals (male and female) behave.

It certainly fits me: there is no "born" ugly girl, just girls that haven't discovered their better angle, or that have let themselves become ugly.




qtns2di4


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses
0 Responses