Just to be fully clear with my position

I would have no problem with any youths in a youth liberated society choosing not to become emancipated and to live under parental authority, including full dependence on their parents, if this is what they chose. I would never suggest that emancipation should be foisted on kids at any point in their lives in the same sense that it's foisted on young people today as soon as they hit their 18th birthday. People should have as much right to live under some form of authority as they do to be free from unreasonable authority. I just wanted to make this clear, as it appears I needed to do so. As long as you would never expect some outside armed agency--be it a state or a privately hired band of mercenaries--to enforce maternal sovereignty upon kids against their will, I have no problem whatsoever with your belief in the concept, because in such a case you are not purporting to violate anyone's civil rights. I would never attempt to censor you from discussing your belief in this area with anyone of any age, and for those who agreed to live that way, that would be their choice, and I would never presume to interfere with it, even if I would share my opinion on the matter with them. You just didn't make it clear that you didn't expect maternal sovereignty to be enforced via force of arms, and that you intended submission to the concept to be voluntary; hence, my initial statements in this thread. If I got you wrong, I duly apologize, and I wish both of us would have been more clear on this particular position from the onset.