Re: 'Caught in the act'

I would hardly class someone who just grabs another person's hand and rubs it against their groin a "sociopath" or "predator". A nuisance maybe, but not a "predator". A "predator" once used to mean a stealthy animal, a killer. A lion or crocodile. Now it means just some grubby idiot doing something like that??

"What if the Dog happens to be a lot bigger and you can't get them to stop and the Humping is really hurting your leg? What would you do under those circumstances? "

I would incrementally step up the resistance tactics until I got it to stop. Probably hit him with a stick, and if he still continues, step it up a notch to some salt on the cock. That always does the job. Their cock is very sensitive!

"Besides that, Humans are supposed to understand how to restrain themselves and listen and communicate with one another about these things."

Says who though? Without proof such an assertion remains purely subjective.

"I did witness an incident like this once in a college setting where some nasty little sociopath grabbed a young lady's hand and rubbed it against the front of his pants. I said something but I'll always wonder if I should have followed my immediate impulse and booted him through the nearest wall."

That would be a completely over-the-top reaction in my books. I mean it might be annoying and embarrassing, but dangerous? Surely not. But why not give the young lady a little bit of self-respect and allow her to slap the guy across the face herself? She might not want all the condescending bravado fuss.

There are many cases of drunk women turning into exhibitionist dirty sluts who grope men and give them unwanted sexual advances, but no we don't see people reacting to that and throwing the horny bitches through walls now, do we. But if MEN do it they become the worst criminal on earth! Hell of a fucking double standard that is!