GirlChat #493421
Question for you folks
Posted by Aramis on 2010-March-02 06:48:26 EST, TuesdayIn the late 60s or early 70s, when the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that pornography was legal, ALL of it was legal, including explicit images of minors enjoying sex.
It was not until years afterwards that images of anyone under 18 enjoying themselves sexually were forbidden.
Now, the Constitution of the United States of America specifically forbids ex post facto laws (laws penalizing you for something that was not unlawful when you did it).
What about the people who collected sexually explicit images of children when it was legal to do so?
Penalizing them seems to be a direct violation of the Constitution.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Yes, but how to prove it. - Dante on 2010-March-04 02:15:51 EST, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Question for you folks - Gimwinkle on 2010-March-03 00:38:01 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Question for you folks - qtns2di4 on 2010-March-02 17:35:33 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Question for you folks - hieronymus on 2010-March-02 17:43:09 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Question for you folks - Gimwinkle on 2010-March-03 12:03:19 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Question for you folks - hieronymus on 2010-March-02 17:43:09 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Question for you folks - SuiDream on 2010-March-02 09:18:27 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- That was my question: - Aramis on 2010-March-04 15:15:02 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)