GirlChat #479152
Re: LGF is false
Posted by griffith on 2009-September-14 17:54:57 EDT, Monday
In reply to LGF is false posted by whitetriangle on 2009-September-14 11:35:27 EDT, Monday
I definitely agree! I've been wondering at it too. Okay, Azure said he meant "Little Girl, Friend", but many others still keep using "Little Girlfriend" to describe their little friends.
I think that if someone is your GF, you and she must have confessed your romantic love to one another.
Secondly: in my youth there was this young woman X who I had fallen in love with and who also liked me quite a lot, though she was not sure about her feelings. We never went to bed, because X was religious. Now, did I call her my girlfriend? No. We never had sex, so she was not my girlfriend. I had some adult GFs when I was younger, girlfriends who gave pussy to me, but she was not one of them.
Yes, in certain circumstances lovers can be lovers even without sex: two kids who love one another, or maybe sometimes an adult and a child. And even two adults in some special circumstances.
I think "LGF" is used too lightly here. I have told that I've had a crush for a certain girl and we have spent time together, but it would feel preposterous, even absurd and perverse (in this case) to call her my GF.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- We should perhaps use BLB instead... - azure on 2009-September-15 12:12:37 EDT, Tuesday - (2 / 0 / 0)