GirlChat #473063
For sure
Posted by Love2uall on 2009-June-29 04:00:23 EDT, Monday
In reply to Agreed... posted by Dissident on 2009-June-28 07:37:11 EDT, Sunday
like I wrote in my post it doesn't matter if there are false affirmations or lies in what the word describes, it's complete fiction, a pure construction of the system, therefore they can make a word mean anything they want.
People live in fiction entirely, they have fiction becoming reality by acting out the fiction world's roles... (And most will say I'm crazy here ahahah! ;)
People are so free that it's scaring them to the point of binding themselves under an outside authority figure in order not to face their own fears, all of this happening most unconsciously and being perpetuated generation after generation...
Most of the time in that system things will look and sound like reality ("reality-based"), but sometimes, in order to get what they want or suit their corporate needs, they (the system) might make a word mean what is good for them, that's what I find is going on there, it's like a contract, you can make the word "tree" mean "apple", the definition will be somewhere on the paper, if not then you refer to the law dictionary, and if it's still not there then the meaning is the usual dictionary one, that's how it works in legal affairs AFAIK.
If they really mean good by doing this I don't see it, or they don't see all the consequences of their acts, however it's up to us not to fall for it, and say in a case, "I am the alleged pedophile, what is believed to be a pedophile (always from their legal definition), however I am not and here's the proof" (you hand them a document that proves you're not the juridical person, you can learn all about that on Vic's website)...
In a case of what is believed to be pedophilia they are alleging we are what is in that definition, it's then up to us to prove otherwise, that's what happens when you act out in this system, when you let them believe you're under them, because you never mentioned otherwise.
If, after mentioning you're not the juridical person they still continue to act like if you are they are committing a crime under s.336 of the CCC (check in your country the equivalent).
Check out http://www.spiritualeconomics.zoomshare.com/ if you haven't already, Vic's website...
Love,
2uall
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
0 Responses