GirlChat #450802


Nit

Posted by Jillium on 2008-September-02 08:30:32 EDT, Tuesday
In reply to a new FAQ for B4U-ACT posted by michaelmelsheimer on 2008-September-02 12:50:46 EDT, Tuesday

  Views: 1    Likes: 0     
Thank you.

> Can you help me with my legal case?

This question implies that there exists a relationship between minor attraction and criminality. You should remove it.

> who is sexually attracted to pre-pubescent children and has either engaged in sexual activity with a child

There's a critical difference between "acted on these urges" and "engaged in sexual activity with a child."

> many minor-attracted people are able to refrain from sexual activity with minors.

How about "do not engage in sexual activity with minors?" Your wording suggests that "restraining" one's sexual feelings is a struggle for MAPs.

> We do not recommend those components of sex offender treatment that are based on an adversarial, law enforcement perspective.
"Sex offender treatment?" Where did that come from? I thought we were talking about MAPs.

And "not support" would be less equivocal than "not recommend." For comparison: "We do not recommend lobotomies."


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses