GirlChat #450791
Board-flooding bastards!!!!!
Posted by jd420 on 2008-September-02 05:19:06 EDT, Tuesday
In reply to a new FAQ for B4U-ACT posted by michaelmelsheimer on 2008-September-02 12:50:46 EDT, Tuesday
I hope that some of you guys will look at it and give us your thoughts.
Oye... you asked for it, didn't you?
Are you talking about pedophiles?
What about paederotic, epheberotic, and nepierotic youth under 16?
I also get the strange feeling that our telierotic and geronterotic youth are somehow getting shut out in the cold here, but have no easy answers. Nonetheless, it might be really damned important to forewarn our mental health professionals that youth under 16 are another very real possibility of a person who does not fit the DSM criteria, yet does fit the mission of the site/alliance/organization/etc.
Arent minor-attracted people child molesters?
A questionable heading, IMO.
Why are you focused on the well-being of minor-attracted people? What about children?
Drop the second question and rewrite the text to reflect this. The logical fallacy of the false dilemna does not deserve one damned bit of the credit you just gave it.
What goals and methods of therapy do you recommend?
If you can fit a bit about the success profile and psychological health problems with "heterosexual conversion therapy" into a short offhand sentence, you might wish to add it.
Can you help me with my legal case?
I'd toss this in a new "for the general public" section, if you can find the other questions to flesh out such a section. Hell, even if not. Someone with such a question is less likely to be MAI than someone without, statistically, so... it's really in the wrong heading.
...just a thought. Keep flooding the board. I look forward to the next updates. :)
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
0 Responses