Don't tell people what to talk about.

You can talk about how some things would be okay in some situations, but recognize the risks of a spanish inquiry that would be traumatizing to most kids that you would not wish to risk subjecting them to by doing anything even if you cared nothing for your own fate nor feared directly harming them.

The reason it's okay to speak hypothetically is because if you move the means of the traumatizing inquisitions, that reason for harm is gone, and it is possible to be happy.

Furthermore, I wasn't aware Jack had a 'how2pedophile' website. Apparently he took pics and said "there's kids here". Wow. Amazing. This resource is unique and irreplacable, thanks for putting your amazing skills to the use Jack, because locating places like that is seriously fucking hard. Basically it was attention whoring and stupid photomongery, that's all. People jumped at the chance to be alarmed by it, so possible if he had any forgiving ulterior motives it would be to demonstrate that flagrantly.

You also saw "sex (not love)". These are not discrete, they can be but they can overlap, don't be so generalizing.

You call for a public stoning of your 'abuser' because he 'schmoozed' you. I don't even know what you're implying with the word, so until I know what actually happened I'm going to think you're insane for wanting to kill a man for 'schmoozing' which is a nonsensical word. Firstly, it's not wrong for him to say it's okay, because it is. Secondly, it would be wrong to say 'no one will know'. He's not omniscient, so he doesn't know whether or not people will know. He should have voiced doubts and the chance that people could know and the problems that could occur if that happened. By overlooking this, he is a liar, and I hate liars, so I will hate this man along with you, but I don't exactly think liars deserve stoning, they just should not be associated with, which I assume you do not anymore.