Hi tyciol,

I would not have drafted a baseless petition, nor would I forward a baseless petition to its recipients.

> oppressive laws violating our natural rights

I am not prepared to defend this statement in my response to you, because it would be overly-long. I will do so in the future.

> We are deprived our property without due process of law

The City of Indianapolis demolished an eight-unit apartment building that I owned, without encumberance, named the "Annabelleigh". During the condemnation hearing, city personnel gave various interviews about me and falsely attributed statements to me on the local CBS and NBC affiliates. The resulting physical assaults I endured prevented me from complying with the condemnation orders requiring completion of residing.

I owned another apartment building and another single-family residential unit during this time. Both fell to foreclosure during this time period.

I was entitled to the billeted revenue from a play that I was producing, Adam's End: Confessions of a Pedophile. The play was scheduled for production at Abingdon Theatre   /cgi/deref.cgi?url=http://www.abingdontheatre.org/  , in June of 2005. The production was disrupted by a crime committed against me in response to a marketing ploy for the play. My suit to recover my losses was dismissed for its potential to disrupt federal-state comity   /cgi/deref.cgi?url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comity  .

Many others who are sexually attracted to youth are deprived of property, without due process, as a result of emotional distress or violence due to invidious animus.

> We are denied free association and free political speech

Permitting, or encouraging, violence against those sexually attracted to youth by the state in response to free association or speech is an abrogation of those rights.

I am the "MAA Partner" in a research project ("MAA Daily Lives") with the University of Winchester, U.K., which seeks to establish baseline and relatively non-controversial facts regarding sexual attraction to youth. The project has been tied up in the University's ethics committee for a year and half now because of the possibility that the University's research personnel could be prosecuted for conducting the research. The laws of the various respondents to the petition provide so little notice as to what conduct, under various child-protection schemes, is prohibited as to deny free association or speech, even after the policy of the Prosecutor here has been delineated in official correspondence to the University.

Our political associations are routinely infiltrated by agents of governments, including NAMBlA, PIE, and IPCE. These agents are not solely concerned with unlawful activity on the part of members, but rather seek to radicalize the agenda of our organizations and otherwise disrupt their effectiveness.

Many others who are sexually attracted to youth are deprived of their rights to free association and speech. All recipients of the Petition maintain schemes that can deprive the youth-attracted of free association with youth for a priori   /cgi/deref.cgi?url=http://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/A_priori   reasons.

> We are denied the right to petition our Representatives

I was held under a judicial order forbidding me to petition the Indiana State Legislature or the National Congress on any matter relating to a civil suit brought against me by the State alleging that my political activity constituted "support of the sexual exploitation of minors". I was denied a hearing on the order, and also a subsequent explanation of the order. The National Congress passed a public law that extended absolute immunity to lawsuit to a private defendant in pending federal litigation of mine (Kevin Brown v. Consolidated City of Indianapolis, et al. (2005)) during the pendency of my gag order.

Many others who are sexually attracted to youth are deprived of the right to petition their respective Representatives.

> our Governments refuse to prosecute those crimes

The State of Indiana unlawfully removed my son from my custody on March 5, 2005, and subsequently perjured themselves in a court of law to support that removal. I was physically assaulted on March 6, 2005, in response to statements made in an interview broadcast on NBC by personnel involved in the removal. I was physically assaulted on April 2, 2005, following a special on CBS wherein false statements were attributed to me by government personnel. I petitioned the FBI; the elected city Prosecutor; the Inspector General; and the District Court with sworn affidavit of the crimes committed against me, and they refused to prosecute.

Many others who are sexually attracted to youth are routinely subject to assaults and other felonious conduct, and our governments refuse to prosecute those crimes unless that prosecution in some way furthers the legitimacy of some scheme to oppress us.

> [We are]deprived of all of the rights commonly
> enjoyed by our neighbors and relations;

Without rights of property, association, speech, or citizenship, one has no right of any meaning.

> we are deprived the alternative of Court

Dred Scott   /cgi/deref.cgi?url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott   was permitted to file on the public docket of the Courts; he was deprived the alternative of Court, as we are, by being denied standing.

"Pedophilia" is a rational basis upon which to deny one standing in a court of law, and this is the practice of the governments of all recipients of the Petition.

Sincerely,

Kevin Brown
Indianapolis, Indiana