GirlChat #332730

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

1st Federal Victory in MAA Civil Rights Litigation

Posted by Kevin Brown on Wednesday, November 16 2005 at 2:20:30PM

My friends and enemies,

Some developments have taken place in my civil rights lawsuit against various parties, which seeks to defend my civil rights as a minor attracted individual.

In March of this year, my local CPS agency kidnapped my son to silence my political advocacy. That they did so for this reason is fairly established now on the basis of incontrovertible evidence. I brought civil action against the caseworker, and her supervisor, who committed this violence against my family, and accused them of conspiring to submit perjured testimony to the juvenile court to secure a detention order for my son.

These two individuals have elected to not contest my allegation, and I am entitled to judgment against them for my damages. The City decided to not represent them against the allegations.

The caseworker was accompanied by law enforcement on the night she effected seizure of my son, and I sued this officer to indemnify him (“hold harmless from claim”) and secure a declaratory statement from the court that he did not participate in the conspiracy between the caseworker and her supervisor. In an odd twist, the City of Indianapolis has denied my allegation that he didn’t participate in the conspiracy, in their answer to me and the federal court. That issue will go to trial.

The City elected to represent the juvenile court in the matter, and has raised issues of lack of jurisdiction for the federal court over the juvenile court, and immunity for the parties involved. This was expected and should be settled fairly soon as to whether they are properly brought to trial or not.

The State has entered two attorneys on the constitutional claims against juvenile law, and their answer is currently due in mid-December. The Federal answers will not be due until mid-January.

I am unable to predict what value the Court will assign to the claims against the caseworker and supervisor. It may exceed a six-figure threshold for the two claims combined; their value is based on case precedent. I am meeting with one of the four prominent law firms in town on Friday, and their partner who specializes in constitutional law, to discuss assigning these claims to a retainer in the amount of fifty thousand dollars. I will have adequate representation now. I am unsure of the wisdom of the City’s legal strategy but it is understandable that they wished to avoid a jury trial over the perjury their defendants committed, and I will secure representation from their action.

Sincerely,

Kevin Brown





Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?