I think most of you reading my posts realize that my posts under the "Kevin Brown" nick have not been directed primarily at the usual BoyChat and GirlChat "crowds"; on the contrary, they are monitored by law enforcement and distributed to affected parties. It has allowed the introduction of evidence in my custody case for my son that would not otherwise have been allowed.

Part 1 - Meeting with United States Assistant District Attorney
Part 2 - Marion County Juvenile Court
Part 3 - Federal District Court - Notice of Removal
Part 4 - Conclusion

I met with an Assistant US District Attorney and presented him a sworn affidavit outlining Federal criminal activity on the part of MCOFC Caseworker Tracy Strong, her Supervisor Peggy Surbey, and her "John Doe" MCOFC Caseworker counterpart. I was unsuccessful in conveying this basic idea to Assistant US District Attorney Mark Massa:

A person cannot use their job to kidnap someone's child because they don't like the person's skin color, or their religion, or their sexual orientation, and then file fraudulent paperwork to a judge to get a warrant legitimizing that seizure.

It is against the god damned law, Mark, and I really fail to see how you could not comprehend that in our conversation today. My "due process" for a criminal act committed against my family is not served in a civil context. Evidence of the criminal act was not available when the trial commenced; I secured it by subpoena.

What I expect is to see the United States District Attorney for the Southern District of Indiana review my complaint, and either advise me as to why I am in error, or empanel a Federal Grand Jury and seek indictment of Ms. Strong. Contrary to your assertion today, the penalty for kidnapping is capital punishment, and I intend to see justice served at some level in the chain of command leading to the U.S. Attorney General. I presented you today with a sworn jurat affidavit alleging a violation of Federal law that is dated and your job responsibilities are defined under the United States Code in terms of pursuing such a complaint. It is irrelevant that the complaint did not originate from the FBI; my sworn jurat affidavit carries the same weight before your office per the USC as such a complaint by any law enforcement agency.

What I didn't say in my post on my court proceeding Wednesday, July 20, 2005 is that Juvenile Court Chief Judge Marily Moore refused to take the bench. I am certain she is aware of my case; I made a novel argument in my Motion to Open the Hearing ⚠️ ↗ (it is based on an obscure statute intended to address issues with retention pond drownings of children in the past couple of years here) that has never been made outside of that context, and that is the grounds she pre-emptively opened to the media last week a different case ⚠️ ↗ I posted about recently before her Court. All parties were present at the hearing and ready to proceed; I drove to court Tuesday, the day before, to verify that the pre-trial was on her calendar; I sent my attorney to her chambers to convey my request that she hear my motion to dismiss when she did not appear;

She refused to take the bench.

⛓️‍💥No Text?

I filed a Notice of Removal to transfer the case to Federal District Court. The Federal court did not originally have jurisdiction in my case; the removal is based on claims of my civil rights being violated; it was very expensive; the case will be before District Judge for the Southern District of Indiana Sarah Evan Barker ⚠️ ↗. She is a Reagan appointee to the bench. I believe I would receive a fair hearing in her Court, and I believe she has the resources to properly handle my two complex motions (dismissal and opening the trial) that appear problematic for the Juvenile Court to respond to.

For those parties who think it's a god damned big joke to destroy my family, harm my son, ruin my marriage, violate my civil rights, abrogate your official responsibilities and oaths, misuse your offices to further discrimination against a hated minority, and/or engage in criminal actions under the colour of law, remember this:

The law applies the same to you as it does to me. You have a fool for an attorney if you believe different, or if you believe I am incapable of effecting justice before the law in the kidnapping of my son.

Sincerely,

Kevin Brown
Indianapolis, Indiana