GirlChat #318694
|
I think most of you reading my posts realize that my posts under the "Kevin Brown" nick have not been directed primarily at the usual BoyChat and GirlChat "crowds"; on the contrary, they are monitored by law enforcement and distributed to affected parties. It has allowed the introduction of evidence in my custody case for my son that would not otherwise have been allowed.
Part 1 - Meeting with United States Assistant District Attorney Letter to the United States District Attorney Motion to Open the Hearing (it is based on an obscure statute intended to address issues with retention pond drownings of children in the past couple of years here) that has never been made outside of that context, and that is the grounds she pre-emptively opened to the media last week a different case I posted about recently before her Court. All parties were present at the hearing and ready to proceed; I drove to court Tuesday, the day before, to verify that the pre-trial was on her calendar; I sent my attorney to her chambers to convey my request that she hear my motion to dismiss when she did not appear; She refused to take the bench. Sarah Evan Barker. She is a Reagan appointee to the bench. I believe I would receive a fair hearing in her Court, and I believe she has the resources to properly handle my two complex motions (dismissal and opening the trial) that appear problematic for the Juvenile Court to respond to. For those parties who think it's a god damned big joke to destroy my family, harm my son, ruin my marriage, violate my civil rights, abrogate your official responsibilities and oaths, misuse your offices to further discrimination against a hated minority, and/or engage in criminal actions under the colour of law, remember this: The law applies the same to you as it does to me. You have a fool for an attorney if you believe different, or if you believe I am incapable of effecting justice before the law in the kidnapping of my son. Sincerely, Kevin Brown Indianapolis, Indiana |